|
Watchmen |  | Author: Alan Moore Creator: Dave Gibbons Publisher: DC Comics Category: Book
List Price: $19.99 Buy Used: $4.05 as of 7/31/2010 04:40 MDT details You Save: $15.94 (80%)
New (96) Used (232) Collectible (2) from $4.05
Seller: airportplacebooks Rating: 926 reviews Sales Rank: 1354
Media: Paperback Pages: 416 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.4 Dimensions (in): 10.1 x 6.6 x 0.7
ISBN: 0930289234 Dewey Decimal Number: 741.5941 EAN: 9780930289232 ASIN: 0930289234
Publication Date: April 1, 1995 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Tell A Friend Add to Wishlist
| |
| Features:
| • | ISBN13: 9780930289232 | | • | Condition: New | | • | Notes: BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one million books sold! 98% Positive feedback. Compare our books, prices and service to the competition. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed |
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description This Hugo Award-winning graphic novel chronicles the fall from grace of a group of super-heroes plagued by all-too-human failings. Along the way, the concept of the super-hero is dissected as the heroes are stalked by an unknown assassin.
One of the most influential graphic novels of all time and a perennial bestseller, WATCHMEN has been studied on college campuses across the nation and is considered a gateway title, leading readers to other graphic novels such as V FOR VENDETTA, BATMAN: THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS and THE SANDMAN series.
Amazon.com Review Has any comic been as acclaimed as Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' Watchmen? Possibly only Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns, but Watchmen remains the critics' favorite. Why? Because Moore is a better writer, and Watchmen a more complex and dark and literate creation than Miller's fantastic, subversive take on the Batman myth. Moore, renowned for many other of the genre's finest creations (Saga of the Swamp Thing, V for Vendetta, and From Hell, with Eddie Campbell) first put out Watchmen in 12 issues for DC in 1986-87. It won a comic award at the time (the 1987 Jack Kirby Comics Industry Awards for Best Writer/Artist combination) and has continued to gather praise since. The story concerns a group called the Crimebusters and a plot to kill and discredit them. Moore's characterization is as sophisticated as any novel's. Importantly the costumes do not get in the way of the storytelling; rather they allow Moore to investigate issues of power and control--indeed it was Watchmen, and to a lesser extent Dark Knight, that propelled the comic genre forward, making "adult" comics a reality. The artwork of Gibbons (best known for 2000AD's Rogue Trooper and DC's Green Lantern) is very fine too, echoing Moore's paranoid mood perfectly throughout. Packed with symbolism, some of the overlying themes (arms control, nuclear threat, vigilantes) have dated but the intelligent social and political commentary, the structure of the story itself, its intertextuality (chapters appended with excerpts from other "works" and "studies" on Moore's characters, or with excerpts from another comic book being read by a child within the story), the finepace of the writing and its humanity mean that Watchmen more than stands up--it keeps its crown as the best the genre has yet produced. --Mark Thwaite A Q&A with Dave Gibbons on the Making of Watchmen
Question: You were tasked with drawing new illustrations of key shots from the new Watchmen film. Was it a difficult challenge to re-imagine your work in this movie format? Dave Gibbons: I don’t think that I actually did many key shots from the film. I had to actually imagine them rather than exactly recreate what was going to be in the movie. But as far as the drawings I did for the licensing purposes, accuracy was the real key so that they looked exactly like the movie. Whereas doing the graphic novel was creating stuff afresh and being very creative, this was more the case of interpreting something that already existed. So it was rather more a commercial art job than a creative thing. Q: How many scenes from the original graphic novel did you redraw in the new "movie" format? DG: I kind of did them piecemeal, these licensing drawings. I did do a section of storyboarding for Zack Snyder. There is a part of the movie that isn’t in the graphic novel and he wanted to see how I would have drawn it, if it had been in the graphic novel. So I redid the storyboards as three pages of comic on the nine-panel grid, also getting it coloured by John Higgins so it looked authentic. But I think there were probably only 3 or 4 scenes that I drew, which were from the movie. Q: What was your working method for producing these new illustrations from the film? And how has it changed from when you originally illustrated Watchmen? DG: When you’re producing things from existing material, you have to look at and assemble the references... you know, keep looking backwards and forwards to make sure what you’re drawing is accurate to what’s in the photos. I did have lots of photos from the movie and in some cases I had more or less the illustration I was going to do in photo form, which made it a lot easier. On others I had to construct it from various references: really just the usual illustrator’s job of drawing something to reference. And on the original illustrations of Watchmen, I was free to come up with exactly the angles and exactly the costumes and everything that I wanted to. When you’ve designed a costume and drawn it a few times, you actually internalize it and you find you can draw it without having to refer to reference at all. So in some ways it’s more creative and in some ways it’s easier! Q: In Watchmen: The Art of the Film, there are concept designs by other artists of their visions of your iconic characters. What do you think of their versions and did you offer any guidance while they were working on these? DG: It’s always really interesting to see versions of your characters drawn by other artists. You tend to see things in them that you hadn’t noticed before. So I really enjoyed looking at those. I certainly didn’t offer them any guidance. The purpose of getting those kinds of drawings done is to get a fresh perspective on what exists. I noticed actually that they really stuck more closely to my original designs than those, but I really enjoyed seeing them. Q: Watchmen: Portraits is Clay Enos’s stunning black and white collection of photos of each character from the Watchmen movie. What was it like looking through this book at all the characters you had conceived years ago now being brought to life by actors? DG: It’s rather interesting; you know if you look at the Watching the Watchmen book you can see these characters as fairly sketchy rough conceptual versions. Then when you look at Clay’s book you can actually see them right down to counting the number of pores on the skin on the end of their noses! It’s incredible high focus! It’s like zooming in through space and time to look at the surface of some moon of Saturn or something. I thoroughly enjoyed his book... it had a real artistic quality to it that was really so good. And of course to see these actors who so much are the embodiment of what I drew, that it’s a tremendous thrill to see them made flesh! Q: Watchmen: The Film Companion features some stills from the animated version of The Black Freighter. What do you think of the look and design of this animated feature? DG: It looks really interesting! Although I drew my version in the comic book in a kind of horror-comic style, these are very much in a savage manga style. I think they work really well... they’ve got the kind of manic intensity, which I think that work should have and I really can’t wait to see the whole feature. I’ve seen the trailer for it and that looks great and again they’ve used a lot of the compositions that I came up with but just translated them to this kind of very modern drawn animation. Q: How much time did you spend on the set of Watchmen? Was it a surreal experience to see your work recreated like this? DG: I was on the set of Watchmen for a couple of days and it really was surreal to walk through a door and then suddenly be in the presence of all these people in living breathing flesh! I was there for what you would call the Crimebusters meeting where they were all there in costume in the same room, which was incredible. They had obviously planned that so I would get to see everyone. It was surreal though quite a wonderful experience to see it come to life.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 926
Watchmen by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons July 29, 2010 Cai Yixin Jeremy Alan Moore, probably the best comic book writer of his generation, has just completed a run on Swamp Thing, a run that probably happened to be one of the lesser-known titles at the time. Pushing the envelope with what was possible in sequential storytelling, he helped bring a smorgasbord of mature themes into the fold, in an effort to produce smarter and more sophisticated comics. But that was just only the beginning of a decade of innovation and pizzazz for the comics industry. Watchmen wasn't the only big thing out of that era.
But it was probably the biggest giant at that time, a monolith of twelve extra-sized comic book issues, complete with prose pieces at the end of every issue save the last. Every page holds an average of 6-7 panels, every one of which packed to the gills with immense detail and excellent facial expressions, and these are panels with an average of three dialogue elements and no less. The prose pieces read like something from a novel, something to be expected from a short story. These issues were, in every sense of the word, great value for money at a time where comics were lower priced than in recent years.
So if anyone has any doubt about Watchmen's appeal, let it be clear: Watchmen is a masterpiece of comic book storytelling. The characters have a sense of lovability, largely due to Alan's excellent knack for creating realistic dialogue. Rorschach's hard-boiled journal is one of the highlights of the entire book, as are the Black Freighter sequences. All of Alan's dialogue fabrication skills come to bear in every section of the book in fact, especially the prose pieces.
It is hard to include prose pieces in comics because no one ever reads comics for beautiful prose. Alan took a huge, bold step in that direction by providing much of the back-story in them. But, boy, did they ever work. The excerpts from Hollis Mason's (the first Nite Owl) book are an example of prose done in exactly the same voice and mentality one would expect from the character and not something that would come from the writer itself. These pieces hold much of the struggles and nuances of superhero life, legacy, death and super-villains included. While much of the material today covers these issues in one way or another, it seemed Watchmen did it first. And if it didn't, arguments could be presented that it did those themes like no other work since. Some claimed that these prose pieces, along with the prolonged extra sequences, were dragging the book down. Wrong. It reads exactly like a graphic novel should read.
The doomsday clock ticks ever closer to nuclear war and Richard Nixon is worried. No one really knows what will happen. But when the ending comes like a freight train, a reread seems inevitable. Simply put, this is the book to read if you are a comic book fan wanting a feast, or someone who just happened to hate comics.
If Watchmen is not on your list of top ten graphic novels, throw it away. July 6, 2010 Alexander T. Davenport (Dallas) 0 out of 2 found this review helpful
At the end of each chapter Watchmen meets and raises its own expectations until the final section, where everything completely falls apart.
Fantastic! May 29, 2010 Everett E. Morris The graphic novel itself is, I venture to say, better than the movie. Granted, it does follow suit rather nicely. If you like graphic novels, suspense and super heroes, it will blow your mind.
Awsome May 26, 2010 C. Myers Amazing book, definetly worth buying. If you have never read a graphic novel, this is absolutely the one to start on. If you are a fan of graphic novels and haven't read this, you need to.
That's it? May 23, 2010 J. Dooley (Baltimore, MD) 3 out of 8 found this review helpful
The premise is interesting: If superheroes were real, what kind of personalities would they have? That is, what kind of neuroses/psychoses/emotional instabilities would trouble them? Unfortunately that premise is not enough to hold the reader's attention over 12 very dense issues. A big problem I had with Watchmen was the making up of excuses the characters deployed to justify their behavior. They are so self-absorbed and obsessed with their troubled pasts that they can't move on. I understand some people are like this, but no effort is made on behalf of the characters by the writer to stop wallowing in self-pity and better themselves.
Another problem I had was the lack of a plot. Something is wrong when you spend more time developing the back story than the present-day plot. No sooner is a character revealed or introduced than we are treated to a gratuitous personal history. Some characters flash back to the SAME EVENT so we can see it from multiple points of view--this would be fine if the event were something worth flashing back to, but it's not.
The entire plot turns on the hysteria of an approaching nuclear war between the USA and USSR. This key development isn't really charted through the novel, only catalyzed by a single development early on and built up by blaring newspaper headlines, screaming television newscasters, and fatalistic grumblings of main characters and strangers alike...but no real development.
Finally, there's too much garbage in the middle of the novel. About two full issues' worth are wasted on a newspaper vendor talking to himself about the impending war and some black kid reading a comic about a pirate. These pages are meant to be "literary" and "insightful," but they are completely irrelevant and a waste of time, as are the literary excerpts of various essays and novels by and about the main characters. Later the disappeared author of the comic is mentioned as being involved in the final plot twist. It's a completely meaningless connection because it has no bearing whatsoever on the final outcome.
Then when it FINALLY starts getting good and the characters face each other in a showdown...IT ENDS. That's it. You are left completely unfulfilled. All the pseudointellectual, existential musings amount to nothing...that is, nothing more sophisticated than what you heard said between two college kids after an Intro to Philosophy course.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 926
|
|
| CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME. Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |